Detasare de religie

În prealabil postat de colaps

Nu-i vorba de intenția ta, dar de cele mai multe ori când se începe o discuție despre originea lumii între credincioși și atei ai să ajungi să vezi thread-uri kilometrice care în final nu vor ajuta să convingă nici una dintre taberi asupra punctului de vedere a celeilalte (lălăială cum zicea nea eodor), ba poate chiar va da naștere unor dispute sau crea nervi.

Ironia sortii:nici macar din punct de vedere matematic nu se poate lamuri problema.Ba chiar pare lejer imposibila.Si mai ciudat:unii atei spun asta.Mai mult:chiar ei au ajuns la concluzia unei imposibilitati fie si dpdv matematic.S-a mai discutat asta?BINEINTELES.Morala?Vezi mai jos:


,,Whereas 20th century science and technology somehow removed the philosophical need for anything metaphysical, 21st century science and technology were revealing things that can't be explained through merely assumed physical processes.

• Considering the way the prebiotic soup is referred to in so many discussions of the origin of life as an already established reality, it comes as something of a shock to realize that there is absolutely no positive evidence for its existence.

Something wasn't connecting here - scientists across the board (whether atheist, agnostic or theist) were declaring that spontaneous generation was disproved one hundred years ago.

In fact, evolutionary scientists themselves started looking at the odds that a free-living, single-celled organism (a bacterium, for example) could result from a chance combining of life building blocks (amino acids, for example). Harold Morowitz, a renowned physicist from Yale University and author of Origin of Cellular Life (1993), declared that the odds for any kind of spontaneous generation were one chance in 10100,000,000,000.

Sir Fred Hoyle, a popular agnostic who wrote Evolution from Space (1981), proposed that such odds were one chance in 1040,000 ("the same as the probability that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard could assemble a 747").

Francis Crick, an atheist and co-discoverer of the ,,DNA structure" in 1953, calls life "almost a miracle." He couldn't rationalize the metaphysical implications of his DNA discovery so he devised his "interstellar spores" theory in the 1970s.

By the way, scientists from various disciplines generally set their "Impossibility Standard" at one chance in 1050 (1 in a 100,000 billion, billion, billion, billion, billion). Therefore, whether one chance in 10100,000,000,000 or one chance in 1040,000, the notion that life somehow rose from non-life has clearly met the scientific standard for statistical impossibility.

Harvard University biochemist and Nobel Laureate George Wald shed perfect light on the whole situation when he declared: ,,One has to only contemplate the magnitude of this task to concede that the spontaneous generation of a living organism is impossible."

QED.