Stephen Hawking: "Dumnezeu nu există"

[AlbertX]

În prealabil postat de t4ilgunn3r

Eu te-am provocat sa ne arati care sunt alte tipuri de masuratori care au contrazis datarea radiometrica; ... Daca vrei discutam despre fiecare in parte.

Uite aici un studiu serios despre datarea radiometrica - Dr. Roger C. Wiens, PhD in Physics.
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens2002.pdf

În prealabil postat de t4ilgunn3r

Alternativ, as vrea sa stiu care sunt viciile de fond ale datarii radiometrice despre care spui ca este folosita atat de eronat.

Nu ai inteles mare lucru, asa-i ? Mai citeste acest studiu de 10 mii de ori, poate intelegi si tu ceva pana la urma.
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens2002.pdf

Nota despre Dr. Roger C. Wiens:
Dr. Wiens has a PhD in Physics, with a minor in Geology. His PhD thesis was on isotope ratios in meteorites, including surface exposure dating. He was employed at Caltech's Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences at the time of writing the first edition. He is presently employed in the Space & Atmospheric Sciences Group at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Dr. Wiens received a bachelor's degree in Physics from Wheaton College and a PhD from the University of Minnesota, doing research on meteorites and moon rocks. He spent two years at Scripps Institution of Oceanography (La Jolla, CA) where he studied isotopes of helium, neon, argon, and nitrogen in terrestrial rocks. He worked seven years in the Geological and Planetary Sciences Division at Caltech, where he continued the study of meteorites and worked for NASA on the feasibility of a space mission to return solar wind samples to Earth for study.

În prealabil postat de AlbertX

Uite aici un studiu serios despre datarea radiometrica - Dr. Roger C. Wiens, PhD in Physics.
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens2002.pdf



Nu ai inteles mare lucru, asa-i ? Mai citeste acest studiu de 10 mii de ori, poate intelegi si tu ceva pana la urma.
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens2002.pdf

Nota despre Dr. Roger C. Wiens:
Dr. Wiens has a PhD in Physics, with a minor in Geology. His PhD thesis was on isotope ratios in meteorites, including surface exposure dating. He was employed at Caltech's Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences at the time of writing the first edition. He is presently employed in the Space & Atmospheric Sciences Group at the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Um.. nu vad cum acest studiu te-ar ajuta sa demonstezi ce spui. Acest studiu este dedicat crestinilor, ca acestia sa inteleaga ca metodele de datare sunt cat de cat precise, si ca pamantul are in jur de 4.3-4.5 miliarde de ani.

"Beyond this, scientists have now used a €œtime machine€ to prove that the half-lives of radioactive species were the same millions of years ago. This time machine does not allow people to actually go back in time, but it does allow scientists to observe ancient events from a long way away. The time machine is called the telescope. Because Gods universe is so large, images from distant events take a long time to get to us.
Telescopes allow us to see supernovae (exploding stars) at distances so vast that the pictures take hundreds of thousands to millions of years to arrive at the Earth. So the events we see today actually occurred hundreds of thousands to millions of years ago. And what do we see when we look back in time?
Much of the light following a supernova blast is powered by newly created radioactive parents. So we observe radiometric decay in the supernova light. The half-lives of decays occurring hundreds of thousands of years ago are thus carefully recorded! These half-lives completely agree with the half-lives measured from decays occurring today. We must conclude that all evidence points towards unchanging radioactive half-lives.
Some individuals have suggested that the speed of light must have been different in the past, and that the starlight has not really taken so long to reach us. However, the astronomical evidence mentioned above also suggests that the speed of light has not changed, or else we would see a significant apparent change in the half-lives of these ancient radioactive decays. "

De fapt, iti multumesc ca ai postat acest studiu! O dovata pentru miliardele de ani ale Universului! Deci Albert, te rog sa citesti cu atentie acest studiu! Este foarte interesant, si o sa te fascineze!